Claire built the brand herself. Seven years of convincing retailers, reformulating the product, negotiating shelf space, and defending a price point that everyone said was too high for the category. By year four, the brand was a fixture in every major French supermarket chain. By year six, it had a reputation. By year seven, it had a problem she hadn't expected: everyone outside France wanted in.
The messages started arriving on LinkedIn, then by email, then through trade show contacts. A Belgian distributor had seen the brand on a shelf in Paris and wanted exclusive rights for the Benelux. A UK importer was asking for a price list and a sample order. Someone in the UAE — a name she didn't recognise — was claiming the category was completely open in the Gulf and that he could move three containers a month from day one.
Claire had a team of eight. None of them had ever worked in export. The company had a French ERP, a French logistics partner, and a website in French. The closest thing to an international strategy was a tab in a spreadsheet labelled "markets to explore — someday."
She said yes to the Belgian distributor. It felt manageable — it was next door, the language was close enough, the retail structure looked familiar. She signed a two-year exclusivity agreement on a call and sent the product catalogue the same afternoon.
Six months later, the Belgian distributor had placed one order. No sell-out data. No store visit report. No second order on the horizon. When Claire asked how the brand was performing on shelf, the response was: "It's early. The market takes time."
She had signed a second agreement by then — with the UK importer. That one had gone similarly. Two deliveries, then silence. She had no idea which stores were carrying the product, whether the price was right, or whether any consumer had ever bought it.
Meanwhile, the UAE contact was still sending messages. And a German distributor had now reached out through a mutual contact in the trade, with what looked like a much stronger profile — but she had no framework to evaluate it against the others.
Claire was building a company with real international appeal and no international infrastructure. Every new agreement was a bet. She had no way to tell a good distributor from a bad one, a promising market from a difficult one, or a real opportunity from an enthusiastic email.
What keeps Claire awake:
- Distributor agreements signed without evaluation — no exit clause, no performance criteria
- No visibility into what the brand looks like on shelves abroad: pricing, placement, rotation
- Inbound interest arriving from markets she knows nothing about, with no framework to respond
- Two existing partnerships performing below expectations, with no leverage to change the situation
- The fear that the best markets are being squandered on the wrong distributors — and the window to enter correctly is closing
Related white paper
Read the white paperWant to explore what the path forward looks like?
Every situation has a structured path forward. We'd be happy to discuss yours — no agenda, just a conversation.
Let's talk